A medication trial is not just "we tried it." A proper trial requires adequate dose, adequate duration, and an explicit decision point at which response is assessed. Many "treatment-resistant" patients have actually failed a series of inadequate trials, and the path forward isn't more aggressive treatment but better-conducted trials.
Adequate dose. Each medication has a therapeutic range. Below the therapeutic range, the trial is testing inadequate exposure, not the medication itself. Sertraline 50 mg for 4 weeks isn't a failed sertraline trial; it's an inadequate trial of sertraline at sub-therapeutic dose. Push to therapeutic dose before declaring non-response.
Adequate duration. Most antidepressants require 6-8 weeks at therapeutic dose for full effect; mood stabilizers may require longer; antipsychotics need 4-6 weeks for full antipsychotic effect. The trial that lasted 2 weeks at a starter dose hasn't been given a fair chance. Patients often want faster judgment; counsel the timeline at the start.
Explicit decision point. Set in advance what you'll be looking at: "At 4 weeks we'll check in; if PHQ-9 hasn't improved by 5 points, we'll consider increasing. At 8 weeks at maximum dose, if less than 50 percent improvement, we'll discuss switching." Without explicit decision points, trials drift indefinitely.
Use structured measures when available. PHQ-9 for depression, GAD-7 for anxiety, YBOCS for OCD, AIMS for tardive dyskinesia. The patient's subjective "I think I'm doing a little better" is informative; the measured improvement quantifies it. Structured measures reduce reliance on memory of how things were and produce trackable trajectories.
Response versus remission. Response is 50 percent improvement; remission is symptom-free or close. Aim for remission, not just response. The patient with response but persistent residual symptoms has a higher recurrence risk and lower functional level than the patient who achieves remission. Push for remission when possible.
Document trials specifically — drug, dose, duration, response, adverse effects. The chart should show what was tried adequately and what wasn't. This protects future clinical decisions and supports appropriate next steps.